Are Video Games and Student Loans just ways to rob younger Americans?

Deal Score0

Video games takes time away from time students need to learn academic materials, it takes money away from students and their parents. For profit Student loans mortgages students future income. Corporations take choices out of younger Americans’ future.

I thought this was the kind of behavior that they frown upon. O’Donnell also sued her former employer for $ 9 million due to “mental anguish”. Doesn’t that sound like a frivolous lawsuit?
divineintervener, she lost the lawsuit.
Touche, she’s not “being open with records” We’re not talking about college exam grades here, this are matters of public record.

32 Comments
  1. Reply
    Petey V3.3
    February 5, 2011 at 4:06 pm

    I dont have a problem with it…

    its a competitive world, I have no problem with people dropping out and getting stupid…it only gets me less competition

  2. Reply
    Sway_27
    February 5, 2011 at 4:54 pm

    nope, you have choices.

  3. Reply
    razzmamatazz
    February 5, 2011 at 5:07 pm

    when students cannot afford to complete their education; and cannot afford to pay their loans based upon their income level–they default on loans and their future is destroyed via the same system used to present an access to an education.

  4. Reply
    Ambassador Z
    February 5, 2011 at 5:10 pm

    This seems to be two different issues here.

    Video games ARE time consuming, taking precious study-time away from students. Parents should strongly advise their children or teens that video games should be recreation. In other words, after all other essentials have been taken care of: chores and studying, THEN they can enjoy the video games.

    As for student loans, they are a necessity for one’s future. Without this money, the education would not be possible. Students and their parents should “shop” around, however, to find the best deals in rates, just as they would for loans for any other purpose.

    Without the education, they will NOT be making that higher income for the rest of their lives. The student loans can be paid off in a reasonable amount of time if they don’t slack off on their monthly payments.

    So I guess you could say that student loans are a necessary “evil.” 🙂

  5. Reply
    FLSwampBoy
    February 5, 2011 at 5:22 pm

    If she had been a DEM candidate, the Right would be screaming 24×7.

  6. Reply
    I'll be honest, will you?
    February 5, 2011 at 6:17 pm

    Lol, nobody’s perfect. Why would I value the opinion of someone who obviously has mistaken judgment issues? It’s called benefit of the doubt, kid.

  7. Reply
    Lady Laissez Faire
    February 5, 2011 at 6:22 pm

    Since when did personal issues, decide whether someone was fit to hold office?

  8. Reply
    TIGER LADY!
    February 5, 2011 at 6:32 pm

    Because she learned from her youthful mistakes,,,,unlike Obama.
    We want REAL people representing us for a change.

  9. Reply
    John Doe
    February 5, 2011 at 6:38 pm

    Why did Obama hire tax cheats as economic advisers?

  10. Reply
    El Tecolote
    February 5, 2011 at 6:38 pm

    I dunno. Why do the Democrats continue to support Charles Rangel and Maxine Waters?

    http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20016211-503544.html

  11. Reply
    Enlightened Liberal
    February 5, 2011 at 7:14 pm

    They think she’s the “new” Sarah Palin.

  12. Reply
    The REAL 0bama-Girl
    February 5, 2011 at 7:56 pm

    Of course, she’s the only one in America who has defaulted. I thought that you liberals keep insisting that bad things happen to good people….

    A lawsuit is only frivolous when a conservative files it, right?

  13. Reply
    Gladys
    February 5, 2011 at 8:52 pm

    Not as bad a Rangle winning re-election, what do you say about that?

  14. Reply
    B Hipsher
    February 5, 2011 at 8:55 pm

    charlie rangle?

  15. Reply
    Scotty Boeman
    February 5, 2011 at 9:47 pm

    because she is considered the norm for them

  16. Reply
    divineintervener
    February 5, 2011 at 10:07 pm

    You guys support a President who attended a racist church and hung around with unabashed terrorists and your excuse was “it doesn’t reflect on his candidacy.” And you’re upset that a GOP candidate defaulted on her mortgage and won a lawsuit?

    Edit: Whatever, she lost, she won, it doesn’t matter. It’s trivial compared to the types of things your candidates do. The drunken murderer Ted Kennedy, the terrorist coddling Barack Obama, KKK member Roberty Byrd. Your people commit murder, treason, and outright bigotry. Our people make geniune mistakes and sometimes default on mortgages and such.

  17. Reply
    Eric Cartman
    February 5, 2011 at 10:53 pm

    nice link you have

  18. Reply
    Evilish-esque
    February 5, 2011 at 11:29 pm

    She also denounces masturbation. This woman is out of control.

  19. Reply
    Chupate esa!
    February 5, 2011 at 11:42 pm

    That standard is just for democrats…

  20. Reply
    Touche'
    February 5, 2011 at 11:53 pm

    So you are against her for having ALL of her records open…. Why dont you ask Obama to even release 1 of his records, then you can see what he is about.

    Why are you against 1 person for being open about what they have done, yet you protect someone who wont release anything in his past?

    Doesnt make any sense to me.

    Please look in Obamas past and see what you can dig up. Not much…. its all sealed and locked away.

  21. Reply
    Robert K
    February 6, 2011 at 12:02 am

    That makes her the perfect GOP candidate

  22. Reply
    JW B
    February 6, 2011 at 12:37 am

    They excuse it by saying “Rangel, Waters, etc” They deflect, they don’t address the issue.

    The Tea Party is supposed to be about sweeping out the old ways in DC. They are sending more of the same.

    Crooks need to go from DC. New crooks don’t need to be sent to replace them.

    LOL at the thumbs down. I live in Delaware and have watched this loon for years. She will not be in DC….thanks Tea Party.

    Karl Rove on her:

    “You didn’t make out a list of the things that Christine O’Donnell had done right. I’ve met her. I got to tell you, I wasn’t frankly impressed as her abilities as a candidate.

    And again, these serious questions about how does she make her living? Why did she mislead voters about her college education? How come it took nearly two decades to pay her college bills so she could get her college degree? How did she make a living? Why did she sue a well-known and well- thougth of conservative think tank?”

    http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/hannity/transcript/karl-rove-questions-christine-o039donnell039s-039serious-character-problems039

  23. Reply
    liberals sequestered from truth
    February 6, 2011 at 12:48 am

    Nobody is perfect my dear,But at least she is thinking in the right direction America should be going.

  24. Reply
    Abraham Obama
    February 6, 2011 at 1:46 am

    Nobody is perfect, look at Obama. The Tea Party doesn’t care about past sins, only what she wants to accomplish in Washington.

  25. Reply
    john a
    February 6, 2011 at 2:09 am

    First she is not a true tea party person. the tea party has been taken over by rich elite 2%. check out the Koch billionaires that have their tea party group. Second when Sarah Palin is a tea party person you know something is wrong. The tea party has been taken over by right wing nuts that are trying to push through their puppets. Hopes that answers your question.

  26. Reply
    Infernal Disaster
    February 6, 2011 at 2:52 am

    The Tea Party may actually be a boon for Democrats.

    By putting forth these corrupt candidates who have no chance of beating Democrats, it seems they may actually keep Democrats in power.

  27. Reply
    Om Prakash P
    February 6, 2011 at 3:51 am

    yes

  28. Reply
    Disco Stu
    February 6, 2011 at 4:44 am

    If Charlie Rangel can be re-elected, then this is a drop in the bucket. Most politicians have some sort of dirt to dig up somewhere, some more than others.

  29. Reply
    lunatic
    February 6, 2011 at 5:06 am

    Because she recited the tea part mantra and had no previous political experience.

    No other qualifications are required and no amount of historical evidence proving her actions to be contrary to the party line of fiscal responsibility, integrity and honesty is sufficient to dissuade the party faithful from voting for her.

  30. Reply
    andy33020
    February 6, 2011 at 5:29 am

    Why not? Their bench doesn’t exactly include Euclid or James Madison.

  31. Reply
    RoseMarie
    February 6, 2011 at 5:51 am

    Aside from ever thing else we don’t need another Religious fanatic who sounds ridiculous giving her out of. touch views. The Tea Party are far right extremists getting voted in by angry lunatics that don’t care who they are just to prove a point.

  32. Reply
    Kimberli Huggins
    February 6, 2011 at 6:09 am

    “According to the News Journal, O’Donnell has become a professional candidate, living off contributions from her two failed campaigns,” the announcer says. “While leaving a trail of unpaid bills to vendors and staff, O’Donnell instead used those donations for her own personal expenses and rent. … While you work hard to pay your bills and taxes, Christine O’Donnell lives by different rules.”

    If you check out this guide http://www.foreclosureworkoutguide.com , I think it will be beneficial to you and answer some of your questions. The Foreclosure Workout Guide is a free program that gives homeowners a simple step-by-step program that will help them avoid foreclosure.

    Leave a reply

    Register New Account
    Reset Password